Volume 53 - Article 36 | Pages 1145–1172  

Unrealized fertility in demography

By Sara Yeatman, Emily Smith-Greenaway

References

Adsera, A. (2006). An economic analysis of the gap between desired and actual fertility: The case of Spain. Review of Economics of the Household 4(1): 75–95.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Alosaimi, F.D., Bukhari, M., Altuwirqi, M., Habous, M., Madbouly, K., Abotalib, Z., and Binsaleh, S. (2017). Gender differences in perception of psychosocial distress and coping mechanisms among infertile men and women in Saudi Arabia. Human Fertility 20(1): 55–63.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Assaf, S. and Moonzwe Davis, L. (2022). Unrealized fertility among women in low and middle-income countries. PLOS One 17(11): 0276595.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Badolato, L. (2025). The fertility desires–intentions gap in the United States. Population Studies online first.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. (2023). Delayed fertility as a driver of fertility decline? In: Schoen, R. (ed.). The demography of transforming families. Cham: Springer: 41–63.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. (2022). Late fertility intentions increase over time in Austria, but chances to have a child at later ages remain low. Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online 14: 125–139.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, É. and Berghammer, C. (2019). The gap between lifetime fertility intentions and completed fertility in Europe and the United States: A cohort approach. Population Research and Policy Review 38(4): 507–535.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. and Pattaro, S. (2014). Educational differences in fertility desires, intentions, and behaviour: A life course perspective. Advances in Life Course Research 21: 10–27.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bisi, S., Sturm, N., and Van Bavel, J. (2024). Climate change and fertility desires. Demographic Research 51(2): 17–48.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Blair-Loy, M. (2005). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bodin, M. and Björklund, J. (2022). Can I take responsibility for bringing a person to this world who will be part of the apocalypse!?’ Ideological dilemmas and concerns for future well-being when bringing the climate crisis into reproductive decision-making. Social Science and Medicine 302: 114985.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Boell, S.K. and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 34(1): 12.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (1992). Do reproductive intentions matter? International Family Planning Perspectives 18(3): 102–108.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review 27(2): 260–281.

Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (2002). The end of the fertility transition in the developed world. Population and Development Review 28(3): 419–443.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (1997). Trends in unwanted childbearing in the developing world. Studies in Family Planning 28(4): 267–277.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bongaarts, J. (2008). What can fertility indicators tell us about pronatalist policy options? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 6: 39–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brinton, M.C., Bueno, X., Oláh, L., and Hellum, M. (2018). Postindustrial fertility ideals, intentions, and gender inequality: A comparative qualitative analysis. Population and Development Review 44(2): 281–309.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brinton, M.C. and Oh, E. (2019). Babies, work, or both? Highly educated women’s employment and fertility in East Asia. American Journal of Sociology 125(1): 105–140.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Caldwell, J.C. and Schindlmayr, T. (2003). Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: A search for commonalities. Population Studies 57(3): 241–263.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carvalho, A.A., Wong, L.R., and Miranda-Ribeiro, P. (2018). Alice in Wonderland: Unrealized fertility and satisfaction with number of children according to couples’ point of view in a city in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População 35(1): 0049.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carvalho, P.G.C.de, Cabral, C.da S., Ferguson, L., Gruskin, S., and Diniz, C.S.G. (2019). We are not infertile’: Challenges and limitations faced by women in same-sex relationships when seeking conception services in São Paulo, Brazil. Culture, Health and Sexuality 21(11): 1257–1272.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Casterline, J.B. (2019). Childbearing as choice. Paper presented at the Presidential Address at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Austin, Texas, USA, April 10–13, 2019.

Download reference:

Casterline, J.B. and Agyei-Mensah, S. (2017). Fertility desires and the course of fertility decline in sub-Saharan Africa. Population and Development Review 43(S1): 84–111.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Casterline, J.B. and El-Zeini, L.O. (2007). The estimation of unwanted fertility. Demography 44(4): 729–745.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Casterline, J.B. and Han, S. (2017). Unrealized fertility: Fertility desires at the end of the reproductive career. Demographic Research 36(14): 427–454.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Channon, M.D. and Harper, S. (2019). Educational differentials in the realization of fertility intentions: Is sub-Saharan Africa different? PLOS One 14(7): 0219736.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chen, M. and Yip, P.S. (2017). The discrepancy between ideal and actual parity in Hong Kong: Fertility desire, intention, and behavior. Population Research and Policy Review 36(4): 583–605.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Chesnais, J.C. (2000). Determinants of below replacement fertility. Population Bulletin of the United Nations 40/41: 126–136.

Download reference:

Cui, W. (2010). Mother or nothing: The agony of infertility. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 88(12): 881.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dey, I. and Wasoff, F. (2010). Another child? Fertility ideals, resources and opportunities. Population Research and Policy Review 29(6): 921–940.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Dyer, S.J. (2007). The value of children in African countries–Insights from studies on infertility. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 28(2): 69–77.

Weblink:
Download reference:

European Commission (2005). Green paper confronting demographic change: A new solidarity between the generations. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

Download reference:

Fayehun, O., Sanuade, O.A., Ajayi, A.I., and Isiugo-Abanihe, U. (2020). Ethnicity, sex composition of living children, and unrealized fertility in Nigeria. Population Studies 74(3): 351–361.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Foster, D.G. (2020). The Turnaway Study: Ten years, a thousand women, and the consequences of having – or being denied – an abortion. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Download reference:

Gauthier, A.H., Kong, S., Grünwald, O., Bujard, M., Caporali, A., Deimantas, V.J., Emery, T., Jablonski, W., Koops, J., Rijken, A., and Schumann, A. (2023). Data brief: The Generations and Gender Survey second round (GGS-II). GGP Technical Paper Series.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gemmill, A. (2019). From some to none? Fertility expectation dynamics of permanently childless women. Demography 56(1): 129–149.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gipson, J.D., Koenig, M.A., and Hindin, M.J. (2008). The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: A review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning 39(1): 18–38.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., and Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review 41(2): 207–239.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Golovina, K., Nitsche, N., Berg, V., Miettinen, A., Rotkirch, A., and Jokela, M. (2024). Birth cohort changes in fertility ideals: Evidence from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Finland. European Sociological Review 40(3): 326–341.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Greenhalgh, T., Thorne, S., and Malterud, K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? European Journal of Clinical Investigation 48(6): 12931.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Greil, A.L., McQuillan, J., Johnson, K., Slauson-Blevins, K., and Shreffler, K.M. (2010). The hidden infertile: Infertile women without pregnancy intent in the United States. Fertility and Sterility 93(6): 2080–2083.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Harknett, K. and Hartnett, C.S. (2014). The gap between births intended and births achieved in 22 European countries, 2004–07. Population Studies 68(3): 265–282.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Heiland, F., Prskawetz, A., and Sanderson, W.C. (2008). Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data. European Journal of Population 24(2): 129–156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hirt, J., Nordhausen, T., Appenzeller-Herzog, C., and Ewald, H. (2023). Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review. Research Synthesis Methods 14(3): 563–579.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hollos, M., Larsen, U., Obono, O., and Whitehouse, B. (2009). The problem of infertility in high fertility populations: Meanings, consequences, and coping mechanisms in two Nigerian communities. Social Science and Medicine 68(11): 2061–2068.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Iacovou, M. and Tavares, L.P. (2011). Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review 37(1): 89–123.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Inhorn, M.C. (2003). Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: Illustrations from Egypt. Social Science and Medicine 56(9): 1837–1851.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Inhorn, M.C. and Patrizio, P. (2015). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on gender, reproductive technologies, and global movements in the 21st century. Human Reproduction Update 21(4): 411–426.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Inhorn, M.C. and Van Balen, F. (2002). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kohler, H.P., Billari, F.C., and Ortega, J.A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review 28(4): 641–680.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Larsen, U. (2000). Primary and secondary infertility in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Epidemiology 29(2): 285–291.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lazzari, E. (2025). Fertility preferences adjusted: reimagining parenthood in response to the uncertainty of infertility. Genus 81(1): 12.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lazzari, E. and Beaujouan, É (in press). Infertility and unrealized ideal family size. Population and Development Review .

Download reference:

Lee, R.D. (1980). Aiming at a moving target: Period fertility and changing reproductive goals. Population Studies 34(2): 205–226.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Liamputtong, P. (2007). Reproduction, childbearing and motherhood: A cross-cultural perspective. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Download reference:

Lightbourne, R.E. (1985). Desired number of births and prospects for fertility decline in 40 countries. International Family Planning Perspectives 11(1): 34–39.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lightbourne, R.E. (1985). Individual preferences and fertility behavior. In: Cleland, J. and Hobcraft, J. (eds.). Reproductive change in developing countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 165–198.

Download reference:

Mascarenhas, M.N., Flaxman, S.R., Boerma, T., Vanderpoel, S., and Stevens, G.A. (2012). National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLOS Medicine 9(12): 1001356.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McQuillan, J., Greil, A.L., White, L., and Jacob, M.C. (2003). Frustrated fertility: Infertility and psychological distress among women. Journal of Marriage and Family 65(4): 1007–1018.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Merchant, E.K. (2021). Building the population bomb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, W.B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs 120(2): 223–258.

Download reference:

Miller, W.B. and Pasta, D.J. (1995). Behavioral intentions: Which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(6): 530–555.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, S.P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography 40(4): 589–603.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, S.P. and Rackin, H. (2010). The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review 36(1): 91–118.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Müller, M.W., Hamory, J., Johnson-Hanks, J., and Miguel, E. (2022). The illusion of stable fertility preferences. Population Studies 76(2): 169–189.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nishikido, M., Cui, Q., and Esteve, A. (2022). Partnership dynamics and the fertility gap between Sweden and Spain. Genus 78(1): 26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nitsche, N. and Hayford, S.R. (2020). Preferences, partners, and parenthood: Linking early fertility desires, marriage timing, and achieved fertility. Demography 57(6): 1975–2001.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pedro, J., Brandão, T., Schmidt, L., Costa, M.E., and Martins, M.V. (2018). What do people know about fertility? A systematic review on fertility awareness and its associated factors. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 123(2): 71–81.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Philipov, D. (2009). Fertility intentions and outcomes: The role of policies to close the gap. European Journal of Population 25(4): 355–361.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Philipov, D. and Bernardi, L. (2011). Concepts and operationalisation of reproductive decisions: Implementation in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Comparative Population Studies 36(2–3): 531–572.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Quesnel-Vallée, A. and Morgan, S.P. (2003). Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S. Population Research and Policy Review 22(5–6): 497–525.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Régnier-Loilier, A. and Vignoli, D. (2011). Fertility intentions and obstacles to their realization in France and Italy. Population 66(2): 361–389.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ryder, N. and Westoff, C. (1971). Reproduction in the United States: 1965. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Download reference:

Smith, D.J. (2004). Contradictions in Nigeria’s fertility transition: The burdens and benefits of having people. Population and Development Review 30(2): 221–238.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Sobotka, T. and Beaujouan, É. (2014). Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Population and Development Review 40(3): 391–419.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Spéder, Z. and Kapitány, B. (2009). How are time-dependent childbearing intentions realized? Realization, postponement, abandonment, bringing forward. European Journal of Population 25(4): 503–523.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Suzuki, T. (2003). Lowest-low fertility in Korea and Japan. Journal of Population Problems 59(1): 1–6.

Download reference:

Testa, M.R. (2012). Family sizes in Europe: Evidence from the 2011 Eurobarometer survey. Vienna, European Demographic Research Paper.

Download reference:

Thoma, M., Fledderjohann, J., Cox, C., and Adageba, R.K. (2021). Biological and social aspects of human infertility: A global perspective. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Timæus, I.M. and Moultrie, T.A. (2008). On postponement and birth intervals. Population and Development Review 34(3): 483–510.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Trent, R.B. (1980). Evidence bearing on the construct validity of ‘ideal family size. Population and Environment 3: 309–327.

Weblink:
Download reference:

United Nations Population Fund (2025). The real fertility crisis: The pursuit of reproductive agency in a changing world. In: State of World Population. New York: UNFPA.

Download reference:

Van Gerwen, O.T., Muzny, C.A., and Marrazzo, J.M. (2022). Sexually transmitted infections and female reproductive health. Nature Microbiology 7: 1116–1126.

Weblink:
Download reference:

White, L. and McQuillan, J. (2006). No longer intending: The relationship between relinquished fertility intentions and distress. Journal of Marriage and Family 68(2): 478–490.

Weblink:
Download reference:

World Health Organization (2023). Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Download reference:

Yeatman, S. and Anderson, T. (2025). Unrealized fertility in the U.S.: Results from a pilot test of new measures. Paper presented at the Population Association of America Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, April 11–13, 2025.

Download reference:

Yeatman, S., Sennott, C., and Culpepper, S. (2013). Young women’s dynamic family size preferences in the context of transitioning fertility. Demography 50(5): 1715–1737.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Yeboah, I., Kwankye, S.O., and Frempong-Ainguah, F. (2021). Predictors of underachieved and overachieved fertility among women with completed fertility in Ghana. PLOS One 16(6): e0250881.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article