Volume 54 - Article 34 | Pages 1095–1124  

Economic resources and parity among US women: A conjoint experiment on preferred family scenarios

By Julia Behrman, Emily Marshall, Christine Percheski

Abstract

Background: Economically insecure conditions may be driving young people’s decisions to delay, forgo, or reduce childbearing. Yet establishing a causal link between economic resources and fertility is methodologically fraught. One approach has been to use survey experiments to manipulate hypothetical economic conditions and gauge respondents’ fertility preferences.

Objective: Unlike survey experiments that manipulate economic circumstances and then ask about fertility preferences, our experiment varies both hypothetical economic circumstances and hypothetical parity to test the hypothesis that US women will prefer family scenarios with more (compared to fewer) children under conditions of high economic resources and with fewer (compared to more) children under conditions of low economic resources.

Methods: In an online conjoint survey experiment with a nationally representative sample of US women aged 18–35 (n = 1,794), respondents chose between different family scenarios comprised of randomly varied attributes, including parity and economic resources. We examine how these two attributes interact to predict preferred family scenarios.

Results: There was no evidence that respondents preferred family scenarios with more (compared to fewer) children under conditions of high economic resources or preferred family scenarios with fewer (compared to more) children under conditions of low economic resources.

Contribution: We provide new experimental evidence about whether economic resources and parity interact to predict preferred family scenarios. Our findings are consistent with scholarship suggesting that although economic factors shape decisions about family life, the rational-actor framework is insufficient for understanding contemporary US fertility declines.

Author’s Affiliation

• Julia Behrman - Northwestern University, United States of America EMAIL
• Emily Marshall - Franklin & Marshall College, United States of America EMAIL
• Christine Percheski - Northwestern University, United States of America EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

Age-heterogamous partnerships: Prevalence and partner differences by marital status and gender composition
Volume 50 - Article 23

Women's employment and fertility in a global perspective (1960–2015)
Volume 43 - Article 25

An exploration of differences in ideal family size between Muslim and non-Muslim women in France
Volume 41 - Article 22

Fertility change in the American Indian and Alaska Native population, 1980–2010
Volume 37 - Article 1

The relationship between women's paid employment and women's stated son preference in India
Volume 36 - Article 52

Out of Sync? Demographic and other social science research on health conditions in developing countries
Volume 24 - Article 2

Similar articles in Demographic Research

Partnership life courses and completed fertility in Spain
Volume 54 - Article 29    | Keywords: feature selection, fertility, life course, partnership trajectories, Spain

Harmonised fertility histories in four British longitudinal cohort studies
Volume 54 - Article 18    | Keywords: cohort studies, fertility, harmonised data, United Kingdom

A flexible model for reconstructing education-specific fertility rates: The case of sub-Saharan Africa
Volume 54 - Article 12    | Keywords: Bayesian demography, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), education, fertility, fertility rates, sub-Saharan Africa

Learning and reproductive health: Do early cognitive skills contribute to better sexual and reproductive health outcomes among adolescents in Ethiopia?
Volume 54 - Article 7    | Keywords: adolescence, education, education, Ethiopia, fertility, sub-Saharan Africa

Reassessing the U-shaped relationship between gender equality and fertility: A replication and extension of Kolk’s (2019) study using comprehensive gender equality measures
Volume 53 - Article 29    | Keywords: fertility, gender, gender equality, human development, Human Fertility Database (HFD)