Volume 54 - Article 34 | Pages 1095–1124  

Economic resources and parity among US women: A conjoint experiment on preferred family scenarios

By Julia Behrman, Emily Marshall, Christine Percheski

References

Aassve, A., Adserà, A., Chang, P.Y., Mencarini, L., Park, H., Peng, C., Plach, S., Raymo, J.M., Wang, S., and Yeung, W.J.J. (2024). Family ideals in an era of low fertility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(6): e2311847121.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Alderotti, G., Vignoli, D., Baccini, M., and Matysiak, A. (2021). Employment instability and fertility in Europe: A meta-analysis. Demography 58(3): 871–900.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bazzani, G., Dommermuth, L., Lappegard, T., and Vignoli, D. (2025). Frontiers of self-realisation. How (un)certainty and imaginaries shape fertility intentions in Italy and Norway. Acta Sociologica 69(1): 29–49.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Behrman, J., Marshall, E.A., and Keusch, F. (2025). An experimental approach to assessing young women’s childbearing preferences: A research note on the United States. Demography 62(3): 773–785.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., and Hart, R.K. (2021). Can policies stall the fertility fall? A systematic review of the (quasi-) experimental literature. Population and Development Review 47(4): 913–964.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bloom, D.E., Kuhn, M., and Prettner, K. (2024). Fertility in high-income countries: Trends, patterns, determinants, and consequences. Annual Review of Economics 16: 159–184.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brauner-Otto, S.R. and Geist, C. (2018). Uncertainty, doubts, and delays: Economic circumstances and childbearing expectations among emerging adults. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 39(1): 88–102.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Buckles, K., Hungerman, D., and Lugauer, S. (2021). Is fertility a leading economic indicator? The Economic Journal 131(634): 541–565.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Bulman, G., Goodman, S., and Isen, A. (2022). The effect of financial resources on homeownership, marriage, and fertility: Evidence from state lotteries. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cowan, S.K. and Douds, K.W. (2022). Examining the effects of a universal cash transfer on fertility. Social Forces 101(2): 1003–1030.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Currie, J. and Schwandt, H. (2014). Short- and long-term effects of unemployment on fertility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(41): 14734–14739.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Doepke, M., Hannusch, A., Kindermann, F., and Tertilt, M. (2023). The economics of fertility: A new era. In: Lundberg, S. and Voena, A. (eds.). Handbook of the economics of the family. Amsterdam: Elsevier: 151–254.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Edin, K. and Kefalas, M. (2011). Promises I can keep. Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Edin, K., Kefalas, M.J., and Reed, J.M. (2004). A peek inside the black box: What marriage means for poor unmarried parents. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 1007–1014.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Edin, K. and Nelson, T.J. (2014). Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Download reference:

Edwards, K. (2022). Most Black Americans say they can meet basic needs financially, but many still experience economic insecurity. Washington D.C: Pew Research Center.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Gibson-Davis, C.M., Edin, K., and McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(5): 1301–1312.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Goldstein, J.R., Koulovatianos, C., Li, J., and Schroder, C. (2025). Combining a survey experiment with a lifecycle model to evaluate pronatalist policies. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley, [unpublished manuscript].

Download reference:

Gornick, J.C. and Jäntti, M. (2012). Child poverty in cross-national perspective: Lessons from the Luxembourg Income Study. Children and Youth Services Review 34(3): 558–568.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Guetto, R., Alderotti, G., and Vignoli, D. (2025). Can family policies enhance fertility? An ex ante evaluation through factorial survey experiments. Demography 62(1): 311–334.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hagewen, K.J. and Morgan, S.P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review 31(3): 507–527.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D.J., and Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis 22(1): 1–30.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hamilton, B. and Kirmeyer, S. (2017). Trends and variations in reproduction and intrinsic rates: United States, 1990–2014. National Vital Statistics Reports 66(2): 1–14.

Download reference:

Karabchuk, T., Dülmer, H., and Gatskova, K. (2022). Fertility attitudes of highly educated youth: A factorial survey. Journal of Marriage and Family 84(1): 32–52.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Kavanaugh, K. (2019). Many Americans still face financial instability despite economic growth. Washington D.C: Pew Research Center.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lappegård, T., Kristensen, A.P., Dommermuth, L., Minello, A., and Vignoli, D. (2022). The impact of narratives of the future on fertility intentions in Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family 84(2): 476–493.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Miller, D.R. and Ziegler, J. (2024). Preferential abstention in conjoint experiments. Research and Politics 11(4): 1–8.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mutz, D.C., Pemantle, R., and Pham, P. (2019). The perils of balance testing in experimental design: Messy analyses of clean data. The American Statistician 73(1): 32–42.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Nolan, B., Richiardi, M.G., and Valenzuela, L. (2019). The drivers of income inequality in rich countries. Journal of Economic Surveys 33(4): 1285–1324.

Weblink:
Download reference:

OECD (2024). Labour Market Situation, OECD – Updated: October 2024. Paris: OECD.

Oppenheimer, V.K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review 20(2): 293.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Osterman, M.J.K., Hamilton, B.E., Martin, J.A., Driscoll, A.K., and Valenzuela, C.P. (2025). Births: Final data for 2023. National Vital Statistics Reports 74(1): 1–39.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Percheski, C. and Kimbro, R.T. (2017). Deciding to wait: Partnership status, economic conditions, and pregnancy during the great recession. Sociological Science 4(8): 176–195.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Pritchett, L.H. (1994). Desired fertility and the impact of population policies. Population and Development Review 20(1): 1–55.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Rackin, H.M. and Gibson-Davis, C.M. (2017). Low-income childless young adults’ marriage and fertility frameworks. Journal of Marriage and Family 79(4): 1096–1110.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Ramos, V.J., Kreyenfeld, M., Alonso-Perez, E., Gellert, P., Heisig, J.P., and O’Sullivan, J.L. (2025). Future caregiving responsibilities, employment uncertainties, and expected childbearing behavior: Survey experimental evidence from Germany. Population Research and Policy Review 44(48).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Saez, E. and Zucman, G. (2020). The rise of income and wealth inequality in America: Evidence from distributional macroeconomic accounts. Journal of Economic Perspectives 34(4): 3–26.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schachter, A. (2016). From “different” to “similar”: An experimental approach to understanding assimilation. American Sociological Review 81(5): 981–1013.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schneider, D. (2015). The great recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family 77(5): 1144–1156.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Schneider, D. and Hastings, O.P. (2015). Socioeconomic variation in the effect of economic conditions on marriage and nonmarital fertility in the United States: Evidence from the great recession. Demography 52(6): 1893–1915.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Seltzer, N. (2019). Beyond the great recession: Labor market polarization and ongoing fertility decline in the United States. Demography 56(4): 1463–1493.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smeeding, T.M. (2005). Public policy, economic inequality, and poverty: The United States in comparative perspective. Social Science Quarterly 86(s1): 955–983.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Wijk, D. (2024). Higher incomes are increasingly associated with higher fertility: Evidence from the Netherlands, 2008–2022. Demographic Research 51(26): 809–822.

Weblink:
Download reference:

van Wijk, D. and Billari, F.C. (2024). Fertility postponement, economic uncertainty, and the increasing income prerequisites of parenthood. Population and Development Review 50(2): 287–322.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vignoli, D., Guetto, R., Bazzani, G., Pirani, E., and Minello, A. (2020). A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework. Genus 76(1): 28.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Vignoli, D., Minello, A., Bazzani, G., Matera, C., and Rapallini, C. (2022). Narratives of the future affect fertility: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. European Journal of Population 38(1): 93–124.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article