Volume 54 - Article 6 | Pages 159–176  

He said, she said: How third-party presence shapes infertility reporting in couples

By Ester Lazzari, Nadja Milewski, Jasmin Passet-Wittig

References

Allerbeck, K. and Hoag, W. (1981). Interviewer- und Situationseffekte in Umfragen. Eine log-lineare analyse. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 10(4): 413–426.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Anderson, B.A. and Silver, B.D. (1987). The validity of survey responses: Insights from interviews of married couples in a survey of Soviet emigrants. Social Forces 66(2): 537–554.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Aquilino, W.S. (1993). Effects of spouse presence during the interview on survey responses concerning marriage. Public Opinion Quarterly 57(3): 358–376.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2025). Remoteness areas [electronic resource].

Boeije, H.R. (2004). And then there were three. Self-presentation styles and the presence of the partner as a third person in the interview. Field Methods 16(1): 3–22.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Casterline, J. and Chidambaram, V.C. (1984). The presence of others during the interview and the reporting of contraceptive knowledge and use. In: Ross, J.A. and McNamara, R. (eds.). Survey analysis for the guidance of family planning programs. Liege: Ordina: 267–298.

Download reference:

Cox, C.M., Thoma, M.E., Tchangalova, N., Mburu, G., Bornstein, M.J., Johnson, C.L., and Kiarie, J. (2022). Infertility prevalence and the methods of estimation from 1990 to 2021: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Open 2022(4): hoac051.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Greil, A.L., Slauson-Blevins, K., and McQuillan, J. (2010). The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature. Sociology of Health and Illness 32(1): 140–162.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Hartmann, P. (1996). Evasive responding in interview settings of limited privacy. In: Anuska, F. and Kramberger, A. (eds.). Developments in data analysis. . Ljubljana: FDV publications: 153–165.

Download reference:

Hartmann, P. (1994). Interviewing when the spouse is present. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 6(3): 298–306.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Lazzari, E., Gray, E., and Baffour, B. (2022). A dyadic approach to the study of perceived subfecundity and contraceptive use. Demographic Research 47(1): 1–36.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Milewski, N. and Otto, D. (2017). The presence of a third person in face-to-face interviews with immigrant descendants: Patterns, determinants, and effects. In: Situating children of migrants across borders and origins. Life course research and social policies, vol 7. Dordrecht: Springer.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Mohr, H.M. (1986). Dritte beim Interview: Ergebnisse zu Indikatoren aus dem Bereich Ehe und Partnerschaft mit Daten des “Wohlfahrtssurvey 1984”. ZA-Information / Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung 19: 52–71.

Download reference:

Pollner, M. and Adams, R.E. (1997). The effect of spouse presence on appraisals of emotional support and household strain. Public Opinion Quarterly 61(4): 615–626.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reimondos, A., Evans, A., and Gray, E. (2011). Reports of relationship timing: Missing data and couple agreement. Survey Research Methods 2(5): 75–87.

Download reference:

Reuband, K.H. (1984). Dritte Personen im Interview. Zuhörer, Adressaten oder Katalysatoren der Kommunikation? In: Reuband, K.H. and Meulemann, H. (eds.). Soziale Realität im Interview. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Download reference:

Reuband, K.H. (1992). On third persons in the interview situation and their impact on responses. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 4(3): 269–274.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Reuband, K.H. (1987). Unerwünschte Dritte beim Interview: Erscheinungsformen und Folgen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 16(4): 303–308.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smith, T.W. (1997). The impact of the presence of others on a respondent’s answers to questions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 9(1): 33–47.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Summerfield, M., Garrard, B., Kamath, R., Macalalad, N., Nesa, M.K., Watson, N., Wilkins, R., and Wooden, M. (2022). HILDA user manual – Release 21. Melbourne: Melbourne Institute, Applied Economic and Social Research.

Download reference:

Taylor, B. and Vocht, H. (2011). Interviewing separately or as couples? Considerations of authenticity of method. Qualitative Health Research 21(11): 1576–1587.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Tourangeau, R. and Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin 133(5): 859–883.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J. and Billiet, J. (2001). The impact of third party presence in survey interviews on the measurement of political knowledge. Acta Politica 36(3): 288–307.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G.D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., Rienzi, L., Sunde, A., Schmidt, L., Cooke, I.D., Simpson, J.L., and Poel, S. (2017). The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Human Reproduction 32(9): 1786–1801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Zipp, J.F. and Toth, J. (2002). She said, he said, they said: The impact of spousal presence in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly 66(2): 177–208.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article