Volume 54 - Article 6 | Pages 159–176  

He said, she said: How third-party presence shapes infertility reporting in couples

By Ester Lazzari, Nadja Milewski, Jasmin Passet-Wittig

Abstract

Background: Estimating infertility prevalence at the population level is challenging and little is known about the factors that influence how individuals report it.

Objective: We assess whether third-party presence, such as that of a partner, influences the likelihood of reporting infertility among a sample of heterosexual couples. We also examine the consistency of responses between partners interviewed separately and evaluate whether third-party presence increases agreement or disagreement within couples.

Methods: Using data from the 2019 Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey, we apply descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to assess associations between third-party presence and (1) infertility reporting and (2) consistency of infertility reports between partners.

Results: Overall, 10.1% of men and 16.1% of women reported infertility. When a third party actively influenced the interview, reported infertility increased to 16.7% among men and 21.4% among women. After adjustment for confounders, men interviewed in the presence of an influencing third party had more than twice the odds of reporting infertility, while women had 65% higher odds. Agreement on infertility between partners increased from 7.5% to 14.5% in men’s interviews and from 7.1% to 13.7% in women’s interviews when a third party was present. Adjusted models show that joint infertility reporting was more than twice as likely in the presence of an influencing third party.

Contribution: Interview context influences both the likelihood and framing of infertility reporting. The findings suggest that third-party presence matters for the measurement of sensitive and subjective outcomes that are jointly experienced within couples.

Author’s Affiliation

• Ester Lazzari - Universität Wien, Austria EMAIL
• Nadja Milewski - Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB), Germany EMAIL
• Jasmin Passet-Wittig - Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB), Germany EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

First reproductive experience: A survey module
Volume 53 - Article 37

A dyadic approach to the study of perceived subfecundity and contraceptive use
Volume 47 - Article 1

The contribution of assisted reproductive technology to fertility rates and parity transition: An analysis of Australian data
Volume 45 - Article 35

A decade of life-course research on fertility of immigrants and their descendants in Europe
Volume 40 - Article 46

Is there an association between marital exogamy of immigrants and nonmigrants and their mental health? A two-partners approach
Volume 40 - Article 21

First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation?
Volume 17 - Article 29

Family change and migration in the life course: An introduction
Volume 17 - Article 19

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

First reproductive experience: A survey module
Volume 53 - Article 37    | Keywords: infertility, Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR), miscarriage, pregnancy, reproduction, reproductive trajectory

Socio-economic differences in ART treatment success: Evidence from Italy
Volume 53 - Article 20    | Keywords: assisted reproduction, infertility, Italy, social disparities, treatment success

Religion and union dissolution: Effects of couple and municipal religiosity on divorce and separation
Volume 49 - Article 20    | Keywords: couples, cross-level effects, religion, union dissolution

Accuracy of wives' proxy reports of husbands' fertility preferences in sub-Saharan Africa
Volume 46 - Article 17    | Keywords: couples, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), family planning, fertility, fertility desires, spousal relationships, sub-Saharan Africa

Retraditionalisation? Work patterns of families with children during the pandemic in Italy
Volume 45 - Article 31    | Keywords: breadwinning, couples, COVID-19, employment, families, household employment, Labour Force Survey (LFS), pandemic, women's employment