Volume 23 - Article 1 | Pages 1–40

Multi-residence in France and Australia: Why count them? What is at stake? Double counting and actual family situations

By Laurent Toulemon, Sophie Pennec

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:26 Jun 2009
Date published:02 Jul 2010
Word count:10792
Keywords:Australia, commuters between households, double counting, European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC), family situation, France, household members grid, multiresidence, sample bias, weighting
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.1
 

Abstract

With the increasing diversity of family situations, growing numbers of people, including children, have more than one home. In France, nearly 4% of inhabitants are likely to be counted twice in surveys; while in Australia, the proportion is less than 2%. Taking into account the possibility that a single individual could have multiple residences is necessary not only to avoid double counting, but also to accurately describe the family situations of adults and children. In this paper, we first estimate the proportion of people living in two dwellings and then describe the consequences of these two-home situations for basic estimates of family situations. Our analysis is based on two large-scale surveys: the 2004 EU-SILC in France and the 2001 HILDA in Australia. A striking result is that, in France, half of all children who are counted as living with their fathers are in fact dividing their time between the homes of separated parents.

Author's Affiliation

Laurent Toulemon - Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), France [Email]
Sophie Pennec - Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), France [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Differences in leaving home by individual and parental education among young adults in Europe
Volume 37 - Article 63

» Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The first "YES"
Volume 24 - Article 7

» France: High and stable fertility
Volume 19 - Article 16

» Overview Chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe
Volume 19 - Article 6

» Summary and general conclusions: Childbearing Trends and Policies in Europe
Volume 19 - Article 2

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» An age–period–cohort approach to disentangling generational differences in family values and religious beliefs: Understanding the modern Australian family today
Volume 45 - Article 20    | Keywords: Australia

» Projecting the sexual minority population: Methods, data, and illustrative projections for Australia
Volume 45 - Article 12    | Keywords: Australia

» Late motherhood, late fatherhood, and permanent childlessness: Trends by educational level and cohorts (1950–1970) in France
Volume 45 - Article 10    | Keywords: France

» Union formation under conditions of uncertainty: The objective and subjective sides of employment uncertainty
Volume 45 - Article 5    | Keywords: Australia

» When partners’ disagreement prevents childbearing: A couple-level analysis in Australia
Volume 44 - Article 33    | Keywords: Australia