Volume 30 - Article 65 | Pages 1769–1792

Homogamy in socio-economic background and education, and the dissolution of cohabiting unions

By Elina Mäenpää, Marika Jalovaara

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:10 May 2013
Date published:05 Jun 2014
Word count:6316
Keywords:cohabitation, educational level, heterogamy, homogamy, Nordic countries, registry data, socioeconomic background, union dissolution
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.65
 

Abstract

Background: Despite the increasing prevalence of cohabitation, knowledge of how socio-economic homogamy affects the stability of cohabiting unions is scant. Few studies have compared the effects of homogamy in both ascribed and achieved socio-economic status on union dissolution.

Objective: Our aim is to determine how homogamy and heterogamy in educational level and parental social class affect the risk of cohabitation dissolution in Finland.

Methods: We use unique Finnish register data that includes information on non-marital cohabitation. Cox regression is used to analyse the risk of dissolution in 20,452 cohabitations. We examine the dissolution rates in all possible combinations of partner status, and analyse how these estimates deviate from the main effects of each partner’s status.

Results: According to the findings, homogamy in parental social class is of little consequence in cohabitation dissolution, although cohabitations between people from upper-white-collar and farmer families are disproportionately likely to dissolve. Educational differences between partners are more significant determinants of cohabitation stability: extreme heterogamy is associated with an increased separation risk, and homogamy decreases the separation risk among cohabitors with a higher university degree.

Conclusions: In line with the perception that personal achievement is more significant than social origins in contemporary union dynamics, similarity in educational level increases cohabitation stability more than similarity in socio-economic origin. Although previous Nordic studies report little or no association between educational homogamy or heterogamy and marriage dissolution, our study shows that educational differences do matter in cohabiting unions.

Author's Affiliation

Elina Mäenpää - Helsingin Yliopisto (University of Helsinki), Finland [Email]
Marika Jalovaara - Turun Yliopisto (University of Turku), Finland [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland
Volume 48 - Article 14

» Homeownership after separation: A longitudinal analysis of Finnish register data
Volume 41 - Article 29

» Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe
Volume 37 - Article 37

» From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness
Volume 36 - Article 55

» Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?
Volume 33 - Article 44

» Does his paycheck also matter?: The socioeconomic resources of co-residential partners and entry into parenthood in Finland
Volume 28 - Article 31

» Recent fertility patterns of Finnish women by union status: A descriptive account
Volume 28 - Article 14

» A review of the antecedents of union dissolution
Volume 23 - Article 10

» The effects of socioeconomic and cultural characteristics of regions on the spatial patterns of the Second Demographic Transition in Finland
Volume 19 - Article 61

» Socioeconomic differentials in divorce risk by duration of marriage
Volume 7 - Article 16

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland
Volume 48 - Article 14    | Keywords: cohabitation, union dissolution

» The timing of abortions, births, and union dissolutions in Finland
Volume 37 - Article 28    | Keywords: registry data, union dissolution

» Cross-national differences in women's repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics
Volume 37 - Article 8    | Keywords: cohabitation, union dissolution

» Digit preferences in marriage formation in Sweden: Millennium marriages and birthday peaks
Volume 30 - Article 25    | Keywords: cohabitation, registry data

» ‘Silver splits’ in Europe: The role of grandchildren and other correlates
Volume 46 - Article 21    | Keywords: union dissolution