Volume 31 - Article 3 | Pages 71–104

Do coresidence and intentions make a difference? Relationship satisfaction in married, cohabiting, and living apart together couples in four countries

By Tsui-o Tai, Janeen Baxter, Belinda Hewitt

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:09 Mar 2013
Date published:03 Jul 2014
Word count:6184
Keywords:cohabitation, cross-national research, living apart together (LAT), marriage, relationship satisfaction, unions
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection “New Relationships from a Comparative Perspective” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/19/


Background: A large body of research has compared relationship satisfaction and quality in cohabiting versus married relationships. Despite increased recognition of couples in living apart together (LAT) relationships, very little research has examined the experiences of couples in LAT relationships compared to co-residential unions.

Objective: Our aim is to develop knowledge about the experiences of different union types by investigating relationship satisfaction of people in LAT, cohabiting, and marital relationships. We differentiate those with intentions to marry for cohabiters, and those with intentions to marry or live together in LAT relationships. We also examine differences by gender and country.

Methods: Using data from Wave 1 of the Generations and Gender Survey in France, Germany, Australia, and Russia (n = 9,604), OLS regressions are estimated to investigate a) differences in relationship satisfaction across relationship types, and b) across countries.

Results: Married people have the highest levels of relationship satisfaction. People in non-marital unions with intentions to marry or live together are significantly more satisfied than those without marriage or cohabitation intentions. Those in LAT relationships with no intentions to live together have the lowest levels of relationship satisfaction. There is evidence of cross-national variation with differences in relationship satisfaction by union type most pronounced in Australia and Russia. Gender differences are found with women reporting lower levels of relationship satisfaction than men.

Conclusions: LAT relationships are qualitatively different to co-residential unions. It is important to further develop our understanding of the experiences of couples in these relationships.

Author's Affiliation

Tsui-o Tai - University of Queensland, Australia [Email]
Janeen Baxter - University of Queensland, Australia [Email]
Belinda Hewitt - University of Melbourne, Australia [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Editorial for Special Collection on New Relationships from a Comparative Perspective
Volume 37 - Article 2

» Disagreements among cohabiting and married couples in 22 European countries
Volume 31 - Article 10

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Stable cohabitational unions increase quality of life: Retrospective analysis of partnership histories also reveals gender differences
Volume 40 - Article 24    | Keywords: cohabitation, living apart together (LAT), marriage

» Editorial for Special Collection on New Relationships from a Comparative Perspective
Volume 37 - Article 2    | Keywords: cohabitation, living apart together (LAT), marriage

» Does waiting pay off for couples? Partnership duration prior to household formation and union stability
Volume 33 - Article 22    | Keywords: cohabitation, living apart together (LAT), marriage

» Changes in partnership patterns across the life course: An examination of 14 countries in Europe and the United States
Volume 33 - Article 6    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, unions

» Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, unions