Volume 32 - Article 10 | Pages 311–340

Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment: Dutch focus group research on views on cohabitation and marriage

By Nicole Hiekel, Renske Keizer

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:20 Nov 2013
Date published:03 Feb 2015
Word count:7732
Keywords:cohabitation marriage, commitment, focus groups, Netherlands, risk aversion
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.10
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection “Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/17/
 

Abstract

Background: Dutch adults grew up in a highly individualized country, characterized by high divorce rates, which may have influenced their views on cohabitation and marriage.

Objective: We examine Dutch adults' perceptions of how similar or different cohabitation and marriage are, whether they believe that cohabitation would be a strategy to avoid the risk of divorce, as well as their views on why people marry in individualized societies.

Methods: We analyze seven focus group interviews with 40 Dutch participants, collected in 2012 in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Results: Many participants discussed differences and similarities between cohabitation and marriage in a context of high divorce rates, and frequently viewed cohabitation as a risk-reduction strategy. At the same time, marriage was often seen as ―the real deal‖, in terms of legal arrangements, but also as a symbol of utmost commitment. Less educated participants viewed more financial advantages in cohabitation compared to marriage, and felt more strongly about the symbolic value of marriage than their highly educated counterparts. There was strong consensus that there is not, and should not be, a social norm to marry.

Conclusions: In a context of high relationship instability, cohabitation has become a risk-reduction strategy. When norms to marry are weak, people may marry in order to emphasize the uniqueness of their relationship. However, the individualistic nature of Dutch society is mirrored in respondents' reluctance to set standards or proscribe norms on why and when to marry and their emphasis that cohabitation can also imply high levels of commitment.

Author's Affiliation

Nicole Hiekel - Universität zu Köln, Germany [Email]
Renske Keizer - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Netherlands [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Generations and Gender Programme Wave 1 data collection: An overview and assessment of sampling and fieldwork methods, weighting procedures, and cross-sectional representativeness
Volume 34 - Article 18

» Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34

» Income pooling strategies among cohabiting and married couples: A comparative perspective
Volume 30 - Article 55

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Entry into first marriage in China
Volume 37 - Article 36    | Keywords: cohabitation marriage

» Loneliness among Polish migrants in the Netherlands: The impact of presence and location of partners and offspring
Volume 37 - Article 23    | Keywords: Netherlands

» Supportive families versus support from families: The decision to have a child in the Netherlands
Volume 37 - Article 14    | Keywords: Netherlands

» On the normative foundations of marriage and cohabitation: Results from group discussions in eastern and western Germany
Volume 36 - Article 53    | Keywords: focus groups

» Ethnic differences in family trajectories of young adult women in the Netherlands: Timing and sequencing of events
Volume 35 - Article 24    | Keywords: Netherlands