Volume 32 - Article 58 | Pages 1581–1602

An assessment of recent Iranian fertility trends using parity progression ratios

By Peter McDonald, Meimanat Hosseini-Chavoshi, Mohammad Jalal Abbasi-Shavazi, Arash Rashidian

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:30 Oct 2014
Date published:17 Jun 2015
Word count:5191
Keywords:fertility, Iran, parity progression, pronatalist policy
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.58
 

Abstract

Background: In 2013 a draft population bill was introduced in the Iranian Parliament. Based on the presumption that fertility in Iran had fallen to a very low level, the bill proposed a wide range of pronatalist policies with the aim of increasing fertility to 2.5 births per woman. The draft law called for restrictions on the employment of women and young single people and inducements for women to marry in their late teens. New estimates of fertility, such as those provided in this paper, cast doubt upon the view that fertility had fallen to a very low level. In May 2014 a statement issued by the Supreme Leader provided guidelines for a more moderate approach to sustaining fertility at around the replacement level.

Objective: To measure the trend in fertility in Iran, especially from 2000 onwards.

Methods: Using the 2010 IDHS, the synthetic cohort parity progression ratio method is used to measure the fertility trend in Iran. Synthetic parity progressions are compared with real cohort parity progressions to examine the presence of tempo effects. Comparison is made with age-based measures from surveys, censuses, and the birth registration system.

Results: This paper demonstrates that fertility in Iran was constant for the decade 2000-2009, at a level of around 1.8-2.0 births per woman.

Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence supporting a more moderate approach to sustaining fertility in Iran at around the replacement level.

Comments: The paper demonstrates the advantages of parity-based measurement over age-based measurement when tempo effects may be involved.

Author's Affiliation

Peter McDonald - University of Melbourne, Australia [Email]
Meimanat Hosseini-Chavoshi - Australian National University, Australia [Email]
Mohammad Jalal Abbasi-Shavazi - University of Tehran, Iran (Islamic Republic Of) [Email]
Arash Rashidian - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran (Islamic Republic Of) [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» What happens after you drop out? Transition to adulthood among early school-leavers in urban Indonesia
Volume 30 - Article 41

» Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity
Volume 28 - Article 34

» Family life and developmental idealism in Yazd, Iran
Volume 26 - Article 10

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Fertility progression in Germany: An analysis using flexible nonparametric cure survival models
Volume 35 - Article 18    | Keywords: fertility, parity progression

» Family life and developmental idealism in Yazd, Iran
Volume 26 - Article 10    | Keywords: fertility, Iran

» The contribution of increases in family benefits to Australia’s early 21st-century fertility increase: An empirical analysis
Volume 25 - Article 6    | Keywords: fertility, pronatalist policy

» Tempo-Adjusted Period Parity Progression Measures, Fertility Postponement and Completed Cohort Fertility
Volume 6 - Article 6    | Keywords: fertility, parity progression

» Family histories and the demography of grandparenthood
Volume 39 - Article 42    | Keywords: fertility