Volume 34 - Article 18 | Pages 499–524

Generations and Gender Programme Wave 1 data collection: An overview and assessment of sampling and fieldwork methods, weighting procedures, and cross-sectional representativeness

By Tineke Fokkema, Andrej Kveder, Nicole Hiekel, Tom Emery, Aart C. Liefbroer

Print this page  

 

References

Biemer, P.B. and Christ, S.L. (2008). Weighting survey data. In: De Leeuw, E.D., Hox, J.J., and Dillman, D.A. (eds.). International Handbook of Survey Methodology. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 317–341.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

De Luca, G. and Peracchi, F (2005). Survey participation in the first wave of SHARE. In: Börsch-Supan, A. and Jürges, H (eds.). The Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe - Methodology. Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA): 88–104.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

EUROSTAT (2011). 2009 Comparative EU intermediate quality report - version 3 July 2011. Luxembourg: European Commission, EUROSTAT.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Groves, R.M. (1989). Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley & Sons.

Weblink doi:10.1002/0471725277
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Groves, R.M. and Couper, M.P. (1998). Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Weblink doi:10.1002/9781118490082
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Harkness, J.A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T.P., Lyberg, L.E., Mohler, P.P., Pennell, B.E., and Smith, T.W. (2010). Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.

Weblink doi:10.1002/9780470609927
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Hox, J., De Leeuw, E.D., and Boevé, A. (in preparation). Reliability and Cross-National Comparability of Multiple-Item Constructs.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Klausch, T., Hox, J.J., and Schouten, B. (2013). Measurement effects of survey mode on the equivalence of attitudinal rating scale questions. Sociological Methods & Research 42(3): 227–263.

Weblink doi:10.1177/0049124113500480
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Kveder, A. (2005). Definitions and documentation of the final disposition codes. In: Europe, United Nations Economic Commission for (ed.). Generations & Gender Programme. Survey Instruments. New York and Geneva: United Nations: 115–118.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Kveder, A. (2007). Guidelines for survey fieldwork and panel maintenance. In: Europe, United Nations Economic Commission for (ed.). Generations & Gender Programme. Concepts and Guidelines. New York and Geneva: United Nations: 45–58.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Lynn, P., Beerten, R., Laiho, J., and Martin, J. (2001). Recommended standard final outcome categories and standard definitions of response rate for social surveys. ISER Working Papers.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Pennell, B.-E., Harkness, J.A., Levenstein, R., and Quaglia, M. (2010). Challenges in cross-national data collection. In: Harkness, J.A., Braun, M., Edwards, B., Johnson, T.P., Lyberg, L.E., Mohler, P.P., Pennell, B.-E., and Smith, T.W (eds.). Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley: 269–298.

Weblink doi:10.1002/9780470609927.ch15
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Research, American Association for Public Opinion (2011). Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 7th edition. AAPOR.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Schouten, B., Van den Brakel, J., Buelens, B., Van der Laan, J., and Klausch, T. (2013). Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys. Social Science Research 42: 1555–1570.

Weblink doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.005
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Simard, M. and Franklin, S. (2005). Sample design guidelines. In: Europe, United Nations Economic Commission for (ed.). Generations & Gender Programme. Survey Instruments. New York and Geneva: United Nations: 3–14.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Singer, E. and Ye, C. (2013). The use and effects of incentives in surveys. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645(1): 112–141.

Weblink doi:10.1177/0002716212458082
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Singer, E., Van Hoewyk, J., Gebler, N., Raghunathan, T., and McGonagle, K. (1999). The effect of incentives on response rates in interviewer-mediated surveys. Journal of Official Statistics 15(2): 217–230.

Download reference in RIS | BibTeX

Vergauwen, J., Wood, J., De Wachter, D., and Neels, K. (2015). Quality of demographic data in GGS Wave 1. Demographic Research 32(24): 723–774.

Weblink doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.24
Download reference in RIS | BibTeX