Volume 39 - Article 15 | Pages 431–458 Author has provided data and code for replicating results

Joint lifestyles and the risk of union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation

By Kirsten van Houdt, Anne-Rigt Poortman

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:11 Sep 2017
Date published:07 Sep 2018
Word count:6925
Keywords:cohabitation, divorce, intimate relationship, marriage
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.15
Additional files:readme.39-15 (text file, 935 Byte)
 demographic-research.39-15 (zip file, 82 kB)
 

Abstract

Background: Love, intimacy, and companionship are considered the cement of contemporary couple relationships. Yet previous research studying how the way that couples arrange their social life and leisure time relates to the stability of their union has focused exclusively on married couples.

Objective: This study examines the extent to which married and cohabiting couples have joint lifestyles and how this relates to their risk of union dissolution, and explores heterogeneity within these groups. In this way, it provides insight into how couples in these different types of unions arrange their lives jointly and what keeps them together.

Methods: We apply multilevel panel models and Cox event history models using four waves of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study (N = 4,255).

Results: Cohabiters have more separate lifestyles than married couples, in particular when it comes to joint friendships and social visits, while marital intentions or prior cohabitation makes no difference. Joint lifestyles are – for marriage and cohabitation – negatively related to the risk of union dissolution.

Conclusions: Companionship – that is, a joint lifestyle – seems to have an important role in couple relationships. Although the marital vow still divides couples in how they arrange their lives together, joint lifestyles seem to be equally important in keeping cohabiting and married couples together, suggesting that married and cohabiting couples do not differ in their social foundations.

Contribution: This study is one of the first to examine the relation between joint lifestyles and separation for cohabiting couples, and to use a longitudinal design with a prospective and sophisticated measure of joint lifestyles.

Author's Affiliation

Kirsten van Houdt - Universiteit van Amsterdam, Netherlands [Email]
Anne-Rigt Poortman - Universiteit Utrecht, Netherlands [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Editorial for Special Collection on New Relationships from a Comparative Perspective
Volume 37 - Article 2

» The timing of parenthood and its effect on social contact and support
Volume 36 - Article 62

» Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe
Volume 32 - Article 8

» Income pooling strategies among cohabiting and married couples: A comparative perspective
Volume 30 - Article 55

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Impact of conjugal separation on women’s income in Canada: Does the type of union matter?
Volume 35 - Article 50    | Keywords: cohabitation, divorce, marriage

» Introduction to research on immigrant and ethnic minority families in Europe
Volume 35 - Article 2    | Keywords: cohabitation, divorce, marriage

» Partnership formation and dissolution among immigrants in the Spanish context
Volume 35 - Article 1    | Keywords: cohabitation, divorce, marriage

» Union formation and dissolution among immigrants and their descendants in the United Kingdom
Volume 33 - Article 10    | Keywords: cohabitation, divorce, marriage

» Mixed marriages in Switzerland: A test of the segmented assimilation hypothesis
Volume 38 - Article 48    | Keywords: divorce, marriage