Volume 43 - Article 36 | Pages 1067–1080 Author has provided data and code for replicating results

The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups

By Kamila Kolpashnikova, Man-Yee Kan

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:29 Oct 2019
Date published:07 Oct 2020
Word count:2409
Keywords:gender gap, housework, housework division, intersectionality, marginalization, race/ethnicity
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.36
Additional files:readme.43-36 (text file, 2 kB)
 demographic-research.43-36 (zip file, 12 kB)
 demographic-research.43-36_supplementary material with CI (Word file, 28 kB)
 

Abstract

Background: Most resource-based theoretical frameworks in housework research are tested and further developed based on ‘average’ patterns. Consequently, in countries like the United States these frameworks rely heavily on the patterns among white women in relation to white men. As such, the resource-based factors identified by the frameworks may work to estimate the housework division of white Americans rather than any other groups, particularly racialized women and men.

Objective: We test the extent to which resource-based factors such as time availability and income can account for the gender gap in housework participation among white, Black, and Latinx women and men in the United States.

Methods: Using the Kitagawa‒Oaxaca‒Blinder decomposition method, we analyze time-use diaries from the 2003–2018 American Time Use Survey.

Results: We find that resource-based factors account for the gender gap in housework participation only when there are substantial resource differences between the contrasted groups, the exception being when the comparison is made with Black Americans. The results also show that when any group of women is compared with Black men, resource-based factors have little explanatory power in the intergroup time gap in housework participation.

Conclusions: The findings imply that housework research may need to pay special attention to the diverse effects of gendering and racialization on the division of housework to avoid normalizing the theoretical frameworks that only work for the dominant white groups.

Contribution: This study uses group-level decomposition analysis to compare how resource-based factors apply to the gender gap across racialized groups in the United States.

Author's Affiliation

Kamila Kolpashnikova - University of Oxford, United Kingdom [Email]
Man-Yee Kan - University of Oxford, United Kingdom [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Housework share and fertility preference in four East Asian countries in 2006 and 2012
Volume 41 - Article 35

» A new family equilibrium? Changing dynamics between the gender division of labor and fertility in Great Britain, 1991–2017
Volume 40 - Article 50

» Domestic division of labour and fertility preference in China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan
Volume 36 - Article 18

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» An extended evaluation of the weathering hypothesis for birthweight
Volume 43 - Article 31    | Keywords: race/ethnicity

» Maternal educational attainment and infant mortality in the United States: Does the gradient vary by race/ethnicity and nativity?
Volume 41 - Article 25    | Keywords: race/ethnicity

» Housework division and gender ideology: When do attitudes really matter?
Volume 39 - Article 39    | Keywords: housework

» Gender differences in educational adaptation of immigrant-origin youth in the United States
Volume 38 - Article 39    | Keywords: race/ethnicity

» The role of education in the association between race/ethnicity/nativity, cognitive impairment, and dementia among older adults in the United States
Volume 38 - Article 6    | Keywords: race/ethnicity