Volume 44 - Article 13 | Pages 333–348
Exploring the concept of intensive parenting in a three-country study
|Date received:||19 Jul 2019|
|Date published:||11 Feb 2021|
|Keywords:||cross-national comparison, fertility, intensive parenting, norms hypothesis|
|Additional files:||readme.44-13 (text file, 1 kB)|
|demographic-research.44-13 (zip file, 214 kB)|
Background: In recent decades there has been growing interest in the concept of intensive parenting. However, the literature is mostly qualitative and based on Anglo-Saxon countries. This raises the question of how best to operationalise the concept in a wider cross-national setting.
Objective: This paper aims to operationalise the theoretical concept of intensive parenting in a cross-national perspective.
Methods: The data for this study come from the CROss-National Online Survey panel [CRONOS], conducted in Estonia, Great Britain, and Slovenia in 2017. The analysis is based on 18 items on norms related to raising children. Exploratory factor analyses were carried out to identify dimensions of intensive parenting. Variation by respondents’ sociodemographics for the different dimensions was also analysed.
Results: The results reveal four main dimensions regarding contemporary norms of parenting: a child-centred approach, a focus on stimulating children’s development, personal responsibility to do one’s best for one’s children, and pressure to follow experts’ advice. These four dimensions were found in all three countries.
Conclusions: The results partly confirm the conception of intensive parenting originally suggested by Hays (1986). They also reveal that the phenomenon is not restricted to Anglo-Saxon countries but can be operationalised in a similar way in other countries. The findings also reveal some variation by sociodemographic characteristics, but not in a systematic way.
Contribution: This is the first study to use random probability population-based samples to operationalise the concept of intensive parenting in a cross-national perspective.
Anne Gauthier - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands
Caroline Bryson - Bryson Purdon Social Research LLP (BPSR), United Kingdom
Luisa Fadel - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands
Tina Haux - University of Kent, United Kingdom
Judith Koops - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands
Monika Mynarska - Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie, Poland
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
Free to stay, free to leave: Insights from Poland into the meaning of cohabitation
Volume 31 - Article 36
Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34
Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation
Volume 16 - Article 17
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
Labour market integration, occupational uncertainty, and fertility choices in Germany and the UK
Volume 26 - Article 12 | Keywords: cross-national comparison, fertility
Union formation and fertility amongst immigrants from Pakistan and their descendants in the United Kingdom: A multichannel sequence analysis
Volume 48 - Article 10 | Keywords: fertility
The sex preference for children in Europe: Children’s sex and the probability and timing of births
Volume 48 - Article 8 | Keywords: fertility
Solo living in the process of transitioning to adulthood in Europe: The role of socioeconomic background
Volume 48 - Article 3 | Keywords: cross-national comparison
Parental status homogeneity in social networks: The role of homophilous tie selection in Germany
Volume 48 - Article 2 | Keywords: fertility
Cited References: 29
»View the references of this article
Download to Citation Manager