Volume 48 - Article 1 | Pages 1–18

Interpreting changes in life expectancy during temporary mortality shocks

By Patrick Heuveline

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:09 Aug 2022
Date published:06 Jan 2023
Word count:3935
Keywords:death cohort, life expectancy, mortality shocks, premature mortality
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2023.48.1
 

Abstract

Background: Life expectancy is a pure measure of the mortality conditions faced by a population, unaffected by that population’s age structure. The numerical value of life expectancy also has an intuitive interpretation, conditional on some assumptions, as the expected age at death of an average newborn. This intuitive interpretation gives life expectancy a broad appeal. Changes in life expectancy are also routinely used to assess mortality trends. Interpreting these changes is not straightforward as the assumptions underpinning the intuitive interpretation of life expectancy are no longer valid. This is particularly problematic during mortality ‘shocks,’ such as during wars or pandemics, when mortality changes may be sudden, temporary, and contrary to secular trends.

Objective: This study aims to provide an alternative perspective on what changes in life expectancy measure that remains applicable during mortality shocks.

Conclusions: Returning to two different models that the period life table may represent, I show that a difference in life expectancy is typically interpreted from the synthetic cohort model as the difference in mean longevity between different birth cohorts. However, it can also be interpreted from the stationary population model as a measure of premature mortality in a death cohort. The latter, less common interpretation makes more sense for temporary declines in life expectancy induced by mortality shocks. The absolute change in life expectancy is then an age-standardized value of the average lifespan reduction for people dying during the mortality shock.

Contribution: To clarify what a decline in life expectancy measures during mortality shocks is important, especially as demographers often assess the mortality impact of those shocks using this metric, which gets widely reported beyond demographers’ inner circle.

Author's Affiliation

Patrick Heuveline - University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» A cross-over in Mexican and Mexican-American fertility rates: Evidence and explanations for an emerging paradox
Volume 12 - Article 4

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Life expectancy loss among Native Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic
Volume 47 - Article 9    | Keywords: life expectancy

» Leveraging deep neural networks to estimate age-specific mortality from life expectancy at birth
Volume 47 - Article 8    | Keywords: life expectancy

» The contribution of smoking-attributable mortality to differences in mortality and life expectancy among US African-American and white adults, 2000–2019
Volume 46 - Article 31    | Keywords: life expectancy

» To what extent were life expectancy gains in South Africa attributable to declines in HIV/AIDS mortality from 2006 to 2017? A life table analysis of age-specific mortality
Volume 46 - Article 18    | Keywords: life expectancy

» Is the accuracy of individuals' survival beliefs associated with their knowledge of population life expectancy?
Volume 45 - Article 14    | Keywords: life expectancy

Articles

 

Citations

 

 

Similar Articles

 

 

Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID