Volume 7 - Article 8 | Pages 365–378

Life Expectancy at Current Rates vs. Current Conditions: A Reflexion Stimulated by Bongaarts and Feeney’s "How Long Do We Live?"

By James W. Vaupel

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:27 Mar 2002
Date published:15 Aug 2002
Word count:3271
Keywords:frailty, heterogeneity, life expectancy, tempo effects
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.8
 

Abstract

Life expectancy is overestimated if mortality is declining and underestimated if mortality is increasing. This is the fundamental claim made by Bongaarts and Feeney (2002) in their article "How Long Do We Live?", where they base their claim on arguments about "tempo effects on mortality".
This Reflexion explains why this claim is true in most heterogeneous populations. It suggests that demographers should be careful about distinguishing between life expectancy under current conditions, which is difficult and problematic to assess, and life expectancy at current rates, which can be estimated using standard methods. Finally, it speculates that there may be a deep connection between tempo and heterogeneity.

Author's Affiliation

James W. Vaupel - Syddansk Universitet, Denmark

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Outsurvival as a measure of the inequality of lifespans between two populations
Volume 44 - Article 35

» Onset of the old-age gender gap in survival
Volume 42 - Article 25

» The impact of the choice of life table statistics when forecasting mortality
Volume 41 - Article 43

» The threshold age of the lifetable entropy
Volume 41 - Article 4

» Life lived and left: Estimating age-specific survival in stable populations with unknown ages
Volume 39 - Article 37

» Coherent forecasts of mortality with compositional data analysis
Volume 37 - Article 17

» In Memoriam: Professor Jan M. Hoem
Volume 36 - Article 24

» Demographic characteristics of Sardinian centenarian genealogies: Preliminary results of the AKeA2 study
Volume 32 - Article 37

» The Gompertz force of mortality in terms of the modal age at death
Volume 32 - Article 36

» Maternal longevity is associated with lower infant mortality
Volume 31 - Article 42

» Unobserved population heterogeneity: A review of formal relationships
Volume 31 - Article 22

» The difference between alternative averages
Volume 27 - Article 15

» Attrition in heterogeneous cohorts
Volume 23 - Article 26

» Senescence vs. sustenance: Evolutionary-demographic models of aging
Volume 23 - Article 23

» Total daily change with age equals average lifetime change
Volume 22 - Article 36

» Survival as a Function of Life Expectancy
Volume 21 - Article 29

» The age separating early deaths from late deaths
Volume 20 - Article 29

» Life lived and left: Carey’s equality
Volume 20 - Article 3

» Formal Relationships: Introduction and Orientation
Volume 20 - Article 1

» The relative tail of longevity and the mean remaining lifetime
Volume 14 - Article 7

» Lifesaving, lifetimes and lifetables
Volume 13 - Article 24

» Oldest Old Mortality in China
Volume 8 - Article 7

» Decomposing demographic change into direct vs. compositional components
Volume 7 - Article 1

» Dr. Väinö Kannisto: A Reflexion
Volume 6 - Article 5

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» The relative tail of longevity and the mean remaining lifetime
Volume 14 - Article 7    | Keywords: frailty, heterogeneity, life expectancy

» A matrix approach to the statistics of longevity in heterogeneous frailty models
Volume 31 - Article 19    | Keywords: frailty, heterogeneity

» On the correspondence between CAL and lagged cohort life expectancy
Volume 24 - Article 25    | Keywords: life expectancy, tempo effects

» Attrition in heterogeneous cohorts
Volume 23 - Article 26    | Keywords: frailty, heterogeneity

» Constant global population with demographic heterogeneity
Volume 18 - Article 14    | Keywords: heterogeneity, life expectancy

Articles

»Volume 7

 

Citations

 

Similar Articles

 

 

Jump to Article

Volume Page
Volume Article ID