Volume 33 - Article 12 | Pages 327–362  

Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK

By Ann Berrington, Brienna Perelli-Harris, Paulina Trevena

References

Barlow, A. (2006). Cohabitation Law Reform – Messages From Research. Feminist Legal Studies 14(2): 167–180.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beaujouan, E. and Ni Bhrolchain, M. (2011). Cohabitation and marriage in Britain since the 1970s. Population Trends 145: 35–59.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The Normal Chaos of Love. London: Polity.

Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2003). Change and continuity in family formation among young adults in Britain. Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute Applications and Policy Working Papers.

Download reference:

Berrington, A. (2001). Entry into parenthood and the outcome of cohabiting partnerships in Britain. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(1): 80–96.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Berrington, A. and Stone, J. (2014). Young adults’ transitions to residential independence in Britain: the role of social and housing policy. In: Antonucci, L. and Hamilton, M (eds.). Youth Transitions and Social Policy. Palgrave Publishers.

Download reference:

Billari, F. C. and Liefbroer, A.C (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research 15((2–3): ): 59–75.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Boden, S. (2001). 'Superbrides': Wedding Consumer Culture and the Construction of Bridal Identity. Sociological Research On-Line 6(1).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brines, J. and Joyner, K (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review 64(3): 333–355.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: effects on relationship quality. Social Science Research 33: 1–19.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Brown, S.L., Manning, W., and Payne, K.K (2014). Relationship Quality among Cohabiting versus Married Couples. National Center for Family & Marriage Research Working Paper Series.

Download reference:

Burgoyne, C. B. , Reibstein, J. , Edmunds, A.M., and Routh, D.A (2010). Marital commitment, money and marriage preparation: What changes after the wedding? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 20(5): 390–403.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Carter, J. (2012). What is commitment? Women's accounts of intimate attachment. Families, Relationships and Societies 1(2): 137–153.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Cherlin, A.J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(4): 848–861.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duncan, S. (2011). Personal life, pragmatism and bricolage. Sociological Research Online 16(4).

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duncan, S., Barlow, A., and James, G (2005). Why Don't They Marry-Cohabitation, Commitment and DIY Marriage. Child and Family Law Quarterly 17: 383–398.

Download reference:

Duncan, S. and Phillips, M. (2008). New families? Tradition and change in modern relationships. In: Park, A (ed.). British Social Attitudes: the 24th Report. London: Sage.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Duncan, S. and Smith, D. (2006). Individualisation versus the geography of ‘new’ families. Twenty-First Century Society 1(2): 167–189.

Download reference:

Elzinga, C. and Liefbroer, A.C. (2007). De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: a cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population 23: 225–250.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology 41(1): 65–81.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, eroticism and love in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.

Download reference:

Heckhausen, J. (1999). Developmental Regulation in Adulthood. Age-normative and Sociostructural Constraints as Adaptive Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Download reference:

Hennink, M.M. (2007). International focus group research: A handbook for the health and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Holland, J. A. (2013). Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timing and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research 29.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Jamieson, L., Anderson, M., McCrone, D., Bechhofer, F., Stewart, R., and Li, Y (2002). Cohabitation and commitment: Partnership plans of young men and women. The Sociological Review 50(3): 356–377.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Johnson, M. (1991). Commitment to personal relationships. In: Jones, W. and Periman, D. (eds.). Advances in Personal Relationships. London: 117–143 .

Download reference:

Kiernan, K. and Smith, K. (2003). Unmarried parenthood: new insights from the Millennium Cohort Study. Population Trends 114: 26–33.

Download reference:

Lewis, J. (2001). The end of marriage? Individualism and intimate relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Download reference:

Liefbroer, A.C. and Billari, F.C. (2010). Bringing norms back in. A theoretical and empirical discussion of their importance of understanding demographic behaviour. Population, Space and Place 16: 287–305.

Weblink:
Download reference:

McKee, K. (2012). Young people, homeownership and future welfare. Housing Studies 27(6): 853–862.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Morgan, D.H.J. (1996). Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: : Polity.

Download reference:

Morgan, D.L. (2010). Reconsidering the Role of Interaction in Analyzing and Reporting Focus Groups. Qualitative Health Research 20(5): 718–722.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Park, A. and Rhead, R. (2013). Changing attitudes towards sex, marriage and parenthood. British Social Attitudes .

Perelli-Harris, B. and Lyons-Amos, M (2013). The Heterogeneity of Relationship Patterns: An Examination of 15 Countries using Latent Class Growth Model. University of Southampton, ESRC Centre for Population Change Working Paper.

Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Mynarska, M., Berrington, A., Berghammer, C., Evans, A., Isupova, O., Keizer, R., Klaerner, A., Lappegård, T., and Vignoli, D. (2014). Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia. Demographic Research 31: 1043–1078.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Perelli-Harris, B., Sigle-Rushton, W., Kreyenfeld, M., Lappegård, T., Keizer, R., and Berghammer, C. (2010). The educational gradient of childbearing within cohabitation in Europe. Population and Development Review 36(4): 775–801.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Poortman, A. R. and Mills, M (2012). Investments in marriage and cohabitation: The role of legal and interpersonal commitment. Journal of Marriage and Family 74(2): 357–376.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. Cambridge: Polity.

Download reference:

Smart, C. and Stevens, P (2000). Cohabitation breakdown. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.

Download reference:

Statistics, Office for National (2014). Divorces in England and Wales [electronic resource].

Statistics, Office for National (2014). Live Births in England and Wales by Characteristics of Mother [electronic resource].

Statistics, Office for National (2014). Marriages in England and Wales (Provisional) [electronic resource].

Statistics, Office for National (2013). Trends in civil and religious marriages [electronic resource].

Wiik, K. A., Bernhardt, E., and Noack, T. (2009). A study of commitment and relationship quality in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family 71(3): 465–477. .

Weblink:
Download reference:

Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1(3): 181–203.

Weblink:
Download reference:

Back to the article