Volume 55 - Article 14 | Pages 431–450  

The contribution of forecast uncertainty to lifespan uncertainty

By Ricarda Duerst, Jonas Schöley, Jonas Schöley

Abstract

Background: Period lifespan variability is sometimes interpreted as an indicator of lifespan uncertainty for individual cohort members. Is this an admissible interpretation for living cohort members, given that future death rates are not precisely known?

Objective: To answer this question, we express individual lifespan uncertainty as a function of variation in ages at death in a cohort lifetable and uncertainty about future death rates. We then quantify the importance of each component to total individual lifespan variability of a birth cohort. A small contribution of the forecast variance would support the interpretation of lifespan variability as individual lifespan uncertainty.

Methods: Using Human Mortality Database data for seven European countries, we decompose the total variance in the remaining lifespan at birth, age 40, and age 80 of an individual cohort member into cohort lifetable variance and forecast variance for cohorts born 1871–2019. We do so under Lee–Carter cohort forecast variance and under an empirical forecast variance measure which allows for mortality shocks.

Results: Even when accounting for the possibility of future mortality shocks, the forecast variance component tends to contribute less than 10% to the total lifespan variance of an individual. Exceptions are France and the small and thus volatile population of Iceland. Conditioning on the absence of future mortality shocks, the forecast variance contributes around 1% to total lifespan variance.

Contribution: We give credibility to the interpretation of period lifetable lifespan variance as individual lifespan uncertainty by showing that the lifespan variance of a cohort is mainly determined by expected lifetable variance with smaller contributions from forecast variance.

Author’s Affiliation

• Ricarda Duerst - Max-Planck-Institut für Demografische Forschung, Germany EMAIL
• Jonas Schöley - Max-Planck-Institut für Demografische Forschung, Germany EMAIL
• Jonas Schöley - Max-Planck-Institut für Demografische Forschung, Germany EMAIL

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

The impact of population heterogeneity on the age trajectory of neonatal mortality: A study of US births 2008–2014
Volume 53 - Article 7

The centered ternary balance scheme: A technique to visualize surfaces of unbalanced three-part compositions
Volume 44 - Article 19

Visualizing compositional data on the Lexis surface
Volume 36 - Article 21

Similar articles in Demographic Research

On the relationship between life expectancy, modal age at death, and the threshold age of the life table entropy
Volume 51 - Article 24    | Keywords: Gompertz law, life expectancy, lifespan variation, longevity, mode, mortality

The Average Uneven Mortality index: Building on the ‘e-dagger’ measure of lifespan inequality
Volume 50 - Article 44    | Keywords: exponential distribution, formal demography, lifespan inequality, mortality age-pattern, mortality plateau

How lifespan and life years lost equate to unity
Volume 50 - Article 24    | Keywords: life expectancy, life table entropy, life years lost, lifespan variation

Subnational contribution to life expectancy and life span variation changes: Evidence from the United States
Volume 50 - Article 22    | Keywords: decomposition methods, life expectancy, lifespan variation, subnational mortality

Mortality inequalities at retirement age between migrants and non-migrants in Denmark and Sweden
Volume 50 - Article 18    | Keywords: immigration, life expectancy, lifespan inequality, Nordic countries, pension age, pension policy