Volume 24 - Article 8 | Pages 201–216
Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The first "NO"
|Date received:||21 Aug 2007|
|Date published:||02 Feb 2011|
|Additional files:||Videos (htm file, 12 kB)|
|Weblink:||All publications in this Special Collection "Rostock Debate on Demographic Change" can be found at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/9/|
This paper takes the "no" side in the debate on the question posed in the title. The paper assumes that the dual-earner/dual-carer household model is the most likely aim of policies that push aggressively for gender equality in order to raise fertility. Five objections are discussed: the model does not necessarily lead to a fertility increase; aggressiveness will lead to an imbalance of labor supply and demand, and is likely to confront slowly changing cultural norms; similar policies will also confront the issue of innate gender differences; and country idiosyncrasies prevent the application of a unified policy approach. The paper briefly concludes that compatible gender-neutral family policies and fertility-neutral gender policies are likely to lead to an increase in fertility.
Dimiter Philipov - Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital (IIASA, VID/ÖAW, WU), Austria
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research