Volume 30 - Article 55 | Pages 1527–1560

Income pooling strategies among cohabiting and married couples: A comparative perspective

By Nicole Hiekel, Aart C. Liefbroer, Anne-Rigt Poortman

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:19 Mar 2013
Date published:15 May 2014
Word count:8061
Keywords:cohabitation, commitment, Generations and Gender Survey (GGS), income pooling, marriage
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection “New Relationships from a Comparative Perspective” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/19/


Background: Studies explaining why cohabiters are more likely to keep money separate than spouses have mainly focused on selection processes, without taking into account the heterogeneity within both union types in levels of commitment. Cross-national studies are rare and have predominantly included Northern and Western European countries, the United States, and Canada.

Objective: This study explains the higher likelihood of cohabiters to keep income separate by selection as well as commitment factors and explores country differences, including countries from Central and Eastern Europe.

Methods: Using data from the Generations and Gender Surveys of Bulgaria, France, Georgia, Germany, Romania, and Russia, N=41,456 cohabiting and married individuals are studied. Binary logistic regression models of the likelihood that respondents keep money separate are calculated.

Results: Across countries, higher education, female labor market participation, both partners being employed, short union duration, absence of joint children, presence of separation thoughts, and (for cohabiters) a lack of marital intentions are the most persistent correlates of keeping money separate. Differences between cohabiters and married couples are reduced when selection and commitment are taken into account, but are still significant. Cross-national variation in the effect of cohabitation on keeping separate purses is persistent.

Conclusions: Different money management strategies of cohabiters and spouses can be explained to some extent by selection processes and inherent differences in the level of commitment within cohabitation and marriage. Countries also differ in the socio-economic context and norms concerning the way intimate relationships are organized which might lead to persistent differences in the way cohabiting and married couples organize their income.

Author's Affiliation

Nicole Hiekel - Universität zu Köln, Germany [Email]
Aart C. Liefbroer - Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI), the Netherlands [Email]
Anne-Rigt Poortman - Universiteit Utrecht, the Netherlands [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Parental socioeconomic status and the timing of first marriage: What is the role of unmarried cohabitation? Results from a cross-national comparison
Volume 45 - Article 15

» Running out of time? Understanding the consequences of the biological clock for the dynamics of fertility intentions and union formation
Volume 40 - Article 1

» Love. Break up. Repeat: The prevalence and stability of serial cohabitation among West German women and men born in the early 1970s
Volume 39 - Article 30

» Joint lifestyles and the risk of union dissolution: Differences between marriage and cohabitation
Volume 39 - Article 15

» Editorial for Special Collection on New Relationships from a Comparative Perspective
Volume 37 - Article 2

» The timing of parenthood and its effect on social contact and support
Volume 36 - Article 62

» Generations and Gender Programme Wave 1 data collection: An overview and assessment of sampling and fieldwork methods, weighting procedures, and cross-sectional representativeness
Volume 34 - Article 18

» Risk-avoidance or utmost commitment: Dutch focus group research on views on cohabitation and marriage
Volume 32 - Article 10

» Why do intimate partners live apart? Evidence on LAT relationships across Europe
Volume 32 - Article 8

» European views of divorce among parents of young children: Understanding cross-national variation
Volume 27 - Article 2

» Timing of first union among second-generation Turks in Europe: The role of parents, peers and institutional context
Volume 22 - Article 16

» Trends in living arrangements in Europe: Convergence or divergence?
Volume 19 - Article 36

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK
Volume 33 - Article 12    | Keywords: cohabitation, commitment, marriage

» Cohabitation and marriage in Austria: Assessing the individualization thesis across the life course
Volume 31 - Article 37    | Keywords: cohabitation, commitment, marriage

» Adult children’s union type and contact with mothers: A replication
Volume 48 - Article 23    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland
Volume 48 - Article 14    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage

» Socioeconomic preconditions to union formation: Exploring variation by migrant background
Volume 45 - Article 32    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage