Volume 36 - Article 55 | Pages 1703–1720
From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness
Date received: | 19 Dec 2016 |
Date published: | 25 May 2017 |
Word count: | 2445 |
Keywords: | childlessness, cohabitation, fertility, Finland, marriage, sequence analysis, union trajectories |
DOI: | 10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.55 |
Abstract
Background: Childlessness has increased in many European countries. Partnerships and parenthood are obviously closely related, but there is relatively little knowledge on how childlessness is linked to contemporary union dynamics that involve high rates of separation and unmarried cohabitation.
Objective: To situate (biological) childlessness in longitudinal dynamics of union formation and stability, we take a life-course approach to union trajectories that consist of states entered via the formation and dissolution of cohabitations and marriages. Concretely, we identify groups of similar union trajectories of individuals between the ages of 18 and 39 who are childless at age 42.
Methods: We analyse register data on Finnish men and women born in 1969 and 1970 (childless N=3,241) with sequence, cluster, and multinomial logistic regression methods.
Results: Four clusters of typical union trajectories were identified among the childless and assigned these labels: 1) Never Partnered (45%), characterized by never having entered a coresidential partnership, or just having entered a cohabitation near age 40; 2) Briefly Cohabited (25%), characterized by mostly living single after a brief cohabitation spell; 3) Cohabitors, Often Serial (19%), marked by typically discontinuous cohabitation; and 4) Married (11%). The Never-Partnered cluster is male-dominated. Men with a rural background and less-educated men and women are overrepresented among the Never-Partnered childless.
Conclusions: For the great majority of the childless in our study cohorts, union trajectories are marked by either the (almost) complete absence of coresidential unions or fragmentary cohabitation histories.
Contribution: The study contributes to the literature by showing that union histories, including never partnering as well as cohabitation instability, are key for understanding contemporary childlessness.
Comments: We recommend that you read the paper on screen or print a color version.
Author's Affiliation
Marika Jalovaara - Turun Yliopisto (University of Turku), Finland
Anette Fasang - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research
»
A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland
Volume 48 - Article 14
»
Gender division of housework during the COVID-19 pandemic: Temporary shocks or durable change?
Volume 45 - Article 43
»
The complexity of employment and family life courses across 20th century Europe: More evidence for larger cross-national differences but little change across 1916‒1966 birth cohorts
Volume 44 - Article 32
»
Homeownership after separation: A longitudinal analysis of Finnish register data
Volume 41 - Article 29
»
Pathways to death: The co-occurrence of physical and mental health in the last years of life
Volume 38 - Article 53
»
Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe
Volume 37 - Article 37
»
Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?
Volume 33 - Article 44
»
Homogamy in socio-economic background and education, and the dissolution of cohabiting unions
Volume 30 - Article 65
»
Does his paycheck also matter?: The socioeconomic resources of co-residential partners and entry into parenthood in Finland
Volume 28 - Article 31
»
Recent fertility patterns of Finnish women by union status: A descriptive account
Volume 28 - Article 14
»
A review of the antecedents of union dissolution
Volume 23 - Article 10
»
Socioeconomic differentials in divorce risk by duration of marriage
Volume 7 - Article 16
Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research
»
Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?
Volume 33 - Article 44 | Keywords: cohabitation, Finland, marriage, sequence analysis
»
A register-based account of period trends in union prevalence, entries, and exits by educational level for men and women in Finland
Volume 48 - Article 14 | Keywords: cohabitation, Finland, marriage
»
The role of premarital cohabitation in the timing of first birth in China
Volume 45 - Article 8 | Keywords: childlessness, cohabitation, fertility
»
Stable cohabitational unions increase quality of life: Retrospective analysis of partnership histories also reveals gender differences
Volume 40 - Article 24 | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, sequence analysis
»
Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK
Volume 33 - Article 12 | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, sequence analysis
Articles
Citations
Cited References: 28
»View the references of this article
Download to Citation Manager
Similar Articles
PubMed
Google Scholar