Volume 45 - Article 14 | Pages 453–468

Is the accuracy of individuals' survival beliefs associated with their knowledge of population life expectancy?

By Adriaan Kalwij, Vesile Kutlu Koc

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter

 

 
Date received:15 Nov 2020
Date published:30 Jul 2021
Word count:2493
Keywords:life expectancy, mortality risk, population, subjective survival
DOI:10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.14
 

Abstract

Background: On average, individuals underestimate their survival chances, which could yield suboptimal long-term decisions.

Objective: Is the accuracy of individuals’ survival beliefs associated with their knowledge of population life expectancy of people of their age and gender?

Methods: We use the 1995 and 1996 waves of the Dutch DNB Household Survey (DHS) with data on individuals’ survival beliefs and their knowledge of population life expectancy, supplemented with death registry data for the years 1995 to 2018. The accuracy of their survival beliefs is measured by comparing these beliefs with (actual) survival during the years after the survey was conducted. We provide prima facie evidence on the association between individuals’ knowledge of population life expectancy and the accuracy of their survival beliefs, and quantify this association using mortality risk models that control for socioeconomic status and health-related characteristics.

Results: Individuals with only some over- or underestimation of population life expectancy had, on average, about a one-third smaller difference between their survival beliefs and survival rate than those who severely underestimated population life expectancy. In line with this prima facie evidence, we find that, after controlling for socioeconomic and health characteristics, 55-year-old individuals with one-year of better knowledge of population life expectancy underestimated their lifetime with, on average, about 0.3 years less (95% CI: 0.09–0.52).

Contribution: We provide empirical evidence in support of the hypothesis that individuals with a better knowledge of population life expectancy have more accurate survival beliefs.

Author's Affiliation

Adriaan Kalwij - Universiteit Utrecht, the Netherlands [Email]
Vesile Kutlu Koc - Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Germany [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» An empirical analysis of the importance of controlling for unobserved heterogeneity when estimating the income-mortality gradient
Volume 31 - Article 30

» Lifetime income and old age mortality risk in Italy over two decades
Volume 29 - Article 45

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Life expectancy loss among Native Americans during the COVID-19 pandemic
Volume 47 - Article 9    | Keywords: life expectancy

» Leveraging deep neural networks to estimate age-specific mortality from life expectancy at birth
Volume 47 - Article 8    | Keywords: life expectancy

» The contribution of smoking-attributable mortality to differences in mortality and life expectancy among US African-American and white adults, 2000–2019
Volume 46 - Article 31    | Keywords: life expectancy

» Slow-downs of fertility decline: When should we call it a 'fertility stall'?
Volume 46 - Article 26    | Keywords: population

» To what extent were life expectancy gains in South Africa attributable to declines in HIV/AIDS mortality from 2006 to 2017? A life table analysis of age-specific mortality
Volume 46 - Article 18    | Keywords: life expectancy