Volume 33 - Article 12 | Pages 327–362

Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage: Insights from qualitative research in the UK

By Ann Berrington, Brienna Perelli-Harris, Paulina Trevena

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:27 Nov 2014
Date published:25 Aug 2015
Word count:10940
Keywords:cohabitation, commitment, educational differences, marriage, sequence analysis
Weblink:You will find all publications in this Special Collection “Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia” at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/17/


Background: In the United Kingdom, standard, traditional sequences of family events have been replaced by a de-standardized life course; marriage is postponed and no longer necessary for childbearing; unmarried cohabitation has increased. New sequencing raises questions about the meaning of cohabitation and marriage in peoples’ lives.

Objective: We ask whether, and to what extent, the new sequencing of life events implies a shift in commitment in cohabitation, potentially giving rise to new expressions of commitment and understandings of cohabitation.

Methods: We analysed data from eight focus groups conducted in Southampton, England, by deductively following major themes outlined in the cross-national focus group guidelines, and inductively using themes raised by the respondents themselves.

Results: Personal commitment is similar in cohabiting and marital relationships, although marriage is perceived to embody greater moral and structural commitment. Since marriage is no longer required as a public display of commitment, the wedding has become more important as a symbolic event. Public displays of commitment are increasingly occurring in other ways, such as childbearing and joint mortgages, demonstrating that cohabiting couples can be as committed as married couples. Although couples discussed ways in which commitment could grow over time, this progression was not necessarily talked about in relation to the timing of childbearing. Highly educated groups seem to have a greater expectation than less educated groups that childbearing will follow marriage.

Conclusions: Commitment levels are no longer ascribed solely by union type, but rather by other life events and the couple's own perceived level of commitment.

Author's Affiliation

Ann Berrington - University of Southampton, United Kingdom [Email]
Brienna Perelli-Harris - University of Southampton, United Kingdom [Email]
Paulina Trevena - University of Glasgow, United Kingdom [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Investigating the application of generalized additive models to discrete-time event history analysis for birth events
Volume 47 - Article 22

» The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States
Volume 39 - Article 27

» Cross-national differences in women's repartnering behaviour in Europe: The role of individual demographic characteristics
Volume 37 - Article 8

» The fertility of recent migrants to England and Wales
Volume 34 - Article 36

» Educational differences in timing and quantum of childbearing in Britain: A study of cohorts born 1940−1969
Volume 33 - Article 26

» Exploring social norms around cohabitation: The life course, individualization, and culture: Introduction to Special Collection: "Focus on Partnerships: Discourses on cohabitation and marriage throughout Europe and Australia"
Volume 33 - Article 25

» Changes in partnership patterns across the life course: An examination of 14 countries in Europe and the United States
Volume 33 - Article 6

» Educational differences in early childbearing: A cross-national comparative study
Volume 33 - Article 3

» Towards a new understanding of cohabitation: Insights from focus group research across Europe and Australia
Volume 31 - Article 34

» The changing determinants of UK young adults' living arrangements
Volume 25 - Article 20

» Ukraine: On the border between old and new in uncertain times
Volume 19 - Article 29

Most recent similar articles in Demographic Research

» Stable cohabitational unions increase quality of life: Retrospective analysis of partnership histories also reveals gender differences
Volume 40 - Article 24    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, sequence analysis

» From never partnered to serial cohabitors: Union trajectories to childlessness
Volume 36 - Article 55    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, sequence analysis

» Are there gender differences in family trajectories by education in Finland?
Volume 33 - Article 44    | Keywords: cohabitation, marriage, sequence analysis

» Cohabitation and marriage in Austria: Assessing the individualization thesis across the life course
Volume 31 - Article 37    | Keywords: cohabitation, commitment, marriage

» Income pooling strategies among cohabiting and married couples: A comparative perspective
Volume 30 - Article 55    | Keywords: cohabitation, commitment, marriage