Volume 39 - Article 37 | Pages 991–1008 Author has provided data and code for replicating results

Life lived and left: Estimating age-specific survival in stable populations with unknown ages

By James W. Vaupel, Francisco Villavicencio

Print this page  Facebook  Twitter


Date received:07 Jul 2018
Date published:26 Oct 2018
Word count:5153
Additional files:readme.39-37 (text file, 3 kB)
 demographic-research.39-37 (zip file, 101 kB)
Weblink:All publications in the ongoing Special Collection 8 ""Formal Relationships"" can be found at http://www.demographic-research.org/special/8/


Background: Demographers sometimes observe remaining lifespans in populations of individuals of unknown age. Such populations may have an age structure that is approximately stable. To estimate life tables for these populations, it is useful to know the relationship between the number of individuals at a given age a, and the number of individuals that are expected to die a time units after observation. This result has already been described for stationary populations, but here we extend it to stable populations.

Results: In a stable population, the population at a given age a is a simple function of the number of deaths at remaining lifespan a, the number of deaths at remaining lifespans a and higher, and the population growth rate. This property, which can be useful when ages are unknown, but individuals are followed until death, permits estimation of the underlying unknown survival schedule of the population and calculation of the usual life table functions and statistics, including the stable age structure.

Contribution: The main contribution of this article is to provide a formal proof of the relationship between life lived and life left in stable populations. We also discuss the challenges of applying theoretical relationships to empirical data, especially due to the fact that in real-world applications time is not continuous and some adjustments are necessary to move from a continuous to a discrete-time framework. Two applications, one with simulated data and a second with Swedish data from the 19th century, illustrate these ideas.

Author's Affiliation

James W. Vaupel - Syddansk Universitet, Denmark [Email]
Francisco Villavicencio - Syddansk Universitet, Denmark [Email]

Other articles by the same author/authors in Demographic Research

» Coherent forecasts of mortality with compositional data analysis
Volume 37 - Article 17

» In Memoriam: Professor Jan M. Hoem
Volume 36 - Article 24

» Symmetries between life lived and left in finite stationary populations
Volume 35 - Article 14

» Demographic characteristics of Sardinian centenarian genealogies: Preliminary results of the AKeA2 study
Volume 32 - Article 37

» The Gompertz force of mortality in terms of the modal age at death
Volume 32 - Article 36

» Maternal longevity is associated with lower infant mortality
Volume 31 - Article 42

» Unobserved population heterogeneity: A review of formal relationships
Volume 31 - Article 22

» The difference between alternative averages
Volume 27 - Article 15

» Attrition in heterogeneous cohorts
Volume 23 - Article 26

» Senescence vs. sustenance: Evolutionary-demographic models of aging
Volume 23 - Article 23

» Total daily change with age equals average lifetime change
Volume 22 - Article 36

» Survival as a Function of Life Expectancy
Volume 21 - Article 29

» The age separating early deaths from late deaths
Volume 20 - Article 29

» Life lived and left: Carey’s equality
Volume 20 - Article 3

» Formal Relationships: Introduction and Orientation
Volume 20 - Article 1

» The relative tail of longevity and the mean remaining lifetime
Volume 14 - Article 7

» Lifesaving, lifetimes and lifetables
Volume 13 - Article 24

» Oldest Old Mortality in China
Volume 8 - Article 7

» Life Expectancy at Current Rates vs. Current Conditions: A Reflexion Stimulated by Bongaarts and Feeney’s "How Long Do We Live?"
Volume 7 - Article 8

» Decomposing demographic change into direct vs. compositional components
Volume 7 - Article 1

» Dr. Väinö Kannisto: A Reflexion
Volume 6 - Article 5